A Look at The Four Spent the Day Together from author Chris Kraus β An Iconic Writer Explores New Ground
This latest work centers on individuals chasing after new beginnings, struggling to escape addictions or harmful partnerships, only to witness hope devolve into violence. The author repeatedly invokes the phrase "new beginning", making it intentionally weary through its repetitions. Phrases such as "He could make a fresh start" and "They chose to begin anew" are scattered across the story. And yet, she seems to be making her individual reinvention, as this presents as a new kind of book β observational, authentically narrative. However it turns out to be laden with the same dilemmas and approaches as earlier books.
From Accidental Writer to Iconic Work
The writer was originally an artist who transitioned to writing almost accidentally with her 1997 cult classic I Love Dick, structured as epistles to an unresponsive love interest, converting personal female narrative from abjection into defiance. She kept producing books, but the three subsequent engaging and challenging novels missed the impact and rawness that the epistolary style infused into the voice of I Love Dick. This was not aided by was her role as a nonconformist creator who had turned into a major property owner, so there was considerable focus on real estate deals. It makes sense that she now wants to explore different types of content, turning outward to other people's stories, at a time when she states that contemporary political climate turns intimate literature redundant.
Multiple Generations, Shared Inescapable History
The Four Spent the Day Together is organized into a trio of segments, spanning three generations β all unable to escape their histories. We encounter the narrative about characters Emma and Jasper, versions of the author's parents, transitioning from the urban environment to a pastoral setting. Additionally the account of Kraus, in the guise of protagonist Catt Greene, grappling with the late recognition of I Love Dick, the rise of Trump, and her addict husband her husband Paul. The third thread involves the account of a killing of one directionless individual by another in a locality mostly forsaken by forward-thinking policies only a brief drive from Catt's rural residence in rural Minnesota.
From my perspective as a reader drawn to polished prose of the sort the author herself often avoids, I was enchanted by the literary tone of the opening part.
Being a reader who favors honed writing of the style that Kraus herself tends to eschew, I was seduced by the novelistic voice of the initial part. It possesses a new quality of attentiveness that accommodates minutiae, like the container that the protagonist as a child frees from the ice at the opening of the book, helped by her adored dad. "I found an ice toy!" she declares; "a nice toy", he replies, "the elliptical meanings of words rolling around in their mouths like hard candy". She tells Emma's narrative with curiosity and intimacy. "It seemed to Emma she had entered a dream β not hers, exactly."
Letdown and Fragmentation
I was destined to be disappointed when I wished this new voice could last out the book. Kraus notes here that she is annoyed by the satisfaction those who appreciate polished prose have taken from I Love Dick; she's devoted to fragmentation, to the untidy aesthetics she shares with her hero writer Kathy Acker, and the emptiness and redundancy of her previous novels comes back in the second segment. Catt is trying to renovate multiple decrepit residences in the most troubled areas of Albuquerque while moving between Minnesota and LA, failing to help Paul manage his alcohol use. She feels helpless as Paul transitions between low-resource employment as an substance abuse counselor in a environment propelled by the anger and fear that drives a political win. Multiple pages are devoted about Catt's social media ostracism on social media, her professional designation altered from "novelist" to "property owner" on the online encyclopedia. She still gives the impression to care a little too much about this. On one occasion she states that she's investigating the murder so that before exiting the region, "she may grasp something about an America that her social media opponents would be unable to grasp, would not even see".
The Homicide Account
Then we reach to the murder itself β and the eponymous day passed by the deceased with the perpetrator and his companions. Kraus utilizes great source material, and reconstructs step by step what happened when Brandon came to visit Brittney after meeting her on an app where she marketed explicit images. He sought a sexual encounter but appears congenially to have passed the day alongside her friends, loitering having his vehicle repaired and paying for snacks and drugs, before being murdered by Brittney's partner a man named Micah β a youth with psychological issues who has frequently been hospitalised for fits of anger.
Preoccupation and Open Ends
Catt develops an obsession by the story, and I was intrigued by the way that Kraus's dual urges towards responsible documentation and audacious rule-breaking wrestle in this part. But I'd have liked her to delve deeper into her individual preoccupations here. The standout figure is the character Brittney, who becomes vivid partially because of Catt seeing herself in her β a similarly gifted, tormented individual going off the rails in a difficult, overlooked locality. The author informs us that the protagonist communicates with Brittney in detention, but she fails to enact these dialogues. The whole section feels curiously unresolved, to the extent that her narrative ends almost mid-par