🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are observing closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a rising chorus of states are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and apps are "taking away our kids' childhood". A law could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media users. The media minister have stated that an similar ban remains "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to enact a law increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to restrict their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory statement calling for a ban for minors unless guardian approval is provided. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a good foundation," said the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, support gathered behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the issue.

Charities have raised concerns. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to disturbing online content contends that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to design products and services that are secure and fit for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, regulation is largely occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional access needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws mandating adult authorization for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, other nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies take a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve safety.

Even as this global conversation unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and its followers indicate that governments internationally are no longer content to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.